Carl Froch has bold new theory on why Tyson Fury lost to Oleksandr Usyk

Carl Froch has bold new theory on why Tyson Fury lost to Oleksandr Usyk

Carl fros believes one major factor didn’t work in Tyson Fury’s favor in his Split Decision defeat by Alexander usyk Carl fros has suggested Tyson Fury could have beaten Alexander usyk had the fight not been in Saudi Arabia he believes a British crowd may have been what the Gypsy King needed to get him over the line fro has been a vocal critic of boxing’s move to the Middle East that prompted backlash from Frank Warren who defended the Saudi atmosphere and labeled him a greeneyed monster with his nose pressed up against the window looking in but frock has now told Warren he may have cost Fury the Undisputed heavyweight title by agreeing to hold the bout in Riyad instead of on home soil speaking on his fros on fighting YouTube channel the former super middleweight world champion argued the atmosphere in Saudi Arabia is not up for debate I’ve been to Saudi Arabia the atmosphere every single time I’ve been there has been really poor I enjoyed the 5v5 some great fights somebody’s falling asleep at ringside other people are on their phones when the actions kicking off the Philip hovic Daniel Duo fight was great nobody was interested there was a few British fans in the background out of their seats but everybody ringside it doesn’t lift the fighters and it’s bad for the sport it’s a real shame frock believes the passionate British crowd make make for a far better event hailing his unbelievable first victory over George Groves at the Manchester arena in 2013 and also highlighting Anthony Joshua’s stunning win at Wembley against Wladimir Klitschko in 2017 amongst other examples and he theorized that could have made all the difference for Fury who was only on the receiving end of a split decision defeat despite usyk having the better of the contest